Last year, the Times and the Washington Post shared a Pulitzer Prize for “deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage” of Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. None of the stories established that Donald Trump or members of his campaign had conspired illegally with Russians, though some of the reporting raised that possibility. The Times, for example, reported that, in the summer of 2016, when Donald Trump, Jr., was informed in an e-mail that a high-ranking Russian official was offering to share dirt that could “incriminate” Hillary Clinton, he replied, “I love it.” (When the paper contacted Trump, Jr., for comment, he released the e-mails in question.)
On March 24th, Attorney General William Barr, summarizing the special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report, announced that Mueller had cleared Trump and his campaign…