AUTHOR
Much of the early debate on artificial intelligence, and GenAI in particular, has borrowed from familiar strategy playbooks, contrasting efficiency against differentiation, automation against augmentation, disruption against continuous improvements. These frameworks, useful in their time, tend to flatten organizational reality into binary trade-offs. They capture broad patterns but leave out the subtleties of how AI actually reshapes firms, workforces, and societies.
In reality, AI is not a flat choice between cutting costs or market expansion. It unfolds across nine distinct strategic pathways, defined not just by growth potential, whether Low, Medium, or High, and by employment impact, whether jobs are Killed, Preserved, or Created, but also by a foundational axis that has long remained implicit: integrity alignment.
Integrity itself spans three states: it can be Damaged, when dignity, autonomy,…
