In September 2014 an online zine named ‘OtherZine’ published a short text penned by Toronto-based filmmaker/programmer Clint Enns called, ‘A Series of Questions for Experimental Film and Video Programmers’. Little more than an unnumbered list of 26 tersely-phrased propositions disguised as queries, Enns’ piece ruffled a few feathers and was well-circulated, as it implicitly accused contemporary experimental media curators (and, in turn, the media’s makers and their audiences) of upholding an avant-garde community that is noxiously exclusive, opposed to genuine risk-taking and devoid of humour and pleasure. “Is fun only reserved for after the screening has finished?” asks the 22nd line.
On one hand, it’s a claim that glosses over the reality that, for a certain type of viewer, the discovery of a rigid, formallyrigourous masterpiece can itself be fun,…
