BEFORE this date, tariff laws in the USA imposed a duty on vegetables, but not on fruits. It meant that the status of the tomato was to become a matter of legal importance.
On 10 May 1893, the US Supreme Court settled this controversy by declaring that the tomato is a vegetable, based on the popular definition: quite simply, it was decreed that a vegetable was something that was generally served ‘with dinner and not dessert’.
So that’s settled, then – the tomato is a vegetable! Well, no, because the holding of this case applies only to the interpretation of the Tariff of 1893, and the court accepted that, botanically, the tomato was probably a fruit! Err…
Just to throw extra confusion into the botanical nightmare, watercress is not really…
